翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Doughboy, Nebraska
・ Doughboys (1930 film)
・ Doughboys (Canadian band)
・ Doughboys in Ireland
・ Dougherty
・ Dougherty (apple)
・ Dougherty (surname)
・ Dougherty Comprehensive High School
・ Dougherty County School System
・ Dougherty County, Georgia
・ Dougherty Heights Historic District
・ Dougherty Hills
・ Dougherty Island
・ Dougherty Mission House
・ Dougherty Township, Cerro Gordo County, Iowa
Dougherty v. Stepp
・ Dougherty Valley High School
・ Dougherty, Alameda County, California
・ Dougherty, California
・ Dougherty, Floyd County, Texas
・ Dougherty, Iowa
・ Dougherty, Oklahoma
・ Dougherty, Rains County, Texas
・ Dougherty, Texas
・ Doughface
・ Doughiska
・ Doughnut
・ Doughnut (disambiguation)
・ Doughnut (driving)
・ Doughnut Formation


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Dougherty v. Stepp : ウィキペディア英語版
Dougherty v. Stepp

|}
''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371 (N.C. 1835) is a decision of the North Carolina Supreme Court authored by Chief Justice Thomas Ruffin. For at least a century, this case has been used in first-year Torts classes in American law schools to teach students about the tort of trespass upon real property.〔See, e.g., James Barr Ames and Jeremiah Smith, ''A Selection of Cases on the Law of Torts'' (3rd ed., 1910), Vol. 1, pp. 59-60; Richard Epstein, ''Cases and Materials on Torts'' (8th ed., 2004), pp. 9-10.〕
==Background==

Stepp incorrectly believed that certain unenclosed land belonging to Doughterty belonged to him. Stepp therefore entered the unenclosed land with a surveyor and chain carriers, who began surveying the land.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 Before they had marked any trees or cut any bushes, Dougherty challenged their actions.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕
Dougherty then brought suit against Stepp for trespass ''quare clausum fregit''.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 A trial was held in Buncombe before Judge Martin. Judge Martin held that since Stepp, the defendant, had not damaged Dougherty's land in any way, Stepp had not committed a trespass.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 He therefore directed the jury to find for the defendant.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕
Dougherty then appealed this ruling to the North Carolina Supreme Court.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 Dougherty's lawyer argued that every unwarrantable entering on another's real property constituted a trespass, even if the defendant mistakenly believed that the land belonged to him.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 He also argued that every trespass involves some damage to the property, even if it is only the treading down and bruising of the herbage and shrubbery.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕 Stepp's lawyer did not appear before the North Carolina Supreme Court.〔''Dougherty v. Stepp'', 18 N.C. 371, 371 (N.C. 1835).〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Dougherty v. Stepp」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.